GPT Image 1 vs. Flux 2 Max vs. DALL-E 3: ポートレート完全比較

AniAvatar supports both GPT Image 1 and Flux 2 Max for avatar generation. Each model has distinct strengths for different use cases.

GPT Image 1

Released by OpenAI in April 2025, integrated directly into GPT-4o. Best for:

Consistent photorealistic business portraits
Professional headshots and corporate styles
When consistency across many personas is important

Cost: Approximately $0.04–0.08 per image.

Flux 2 Max

From Black Forest Labs (Germany). Best for:

Creative and editorial styles
High-resolution prints and marketing materials
When GDPR and EU data storage are priorities

Cost: Approximately $0.03–0.06 per image.

DALL-E 3

OpenAI's previous model, still useful for:

Quick concept images and illustrations
Budget-conscious projects
Integration into existing ChatGPT workflows

Cost: Approximately $0.02–0.04 per image.

Comparison Table

| Feature | GPT Image 1 | Flux 2 Max | DALL-E 3 | |---------|-------------|------------|----------| | Photorealism | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ | | Style variety | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ | | Consistency | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★☆☆ | | Speed | ★★★★☆ | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★★ | | Cost | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ |

FAQ

Which model produces the most realistic faces? GPT Image 1 and Flux 2 Max are at a comparable level, with GPT Image 1 slightly better for business styles.

Can I use both models in AniAvatar? Yes. Add your OpenAI API key and Black Forest Labs API key separately in settings.

How do costs differ in practice? For 100 avatars: GPT Image 1 ~$4–8, Flux 2 Max ~$3–6, DALL-E 3 ~$2–4.

Which model should I start with? Start with GPT Image 1 for most business use cases. Switch to Flux 2 Max when you need more creative or artistic styles.

Conclusion

All three models have their place in a professional avatar workflow. AniAvatar gives you the flexibility to choose the best model for each project.

Start free with AniAvatar and discover which model works best for your personas.